Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag

Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF

Spinning

51.70 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability2.7 out of 10

Ergonomics4 out of 10

Gear ratio5.5:1

Maximum drag-

Weight370g / 13.05oz

Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch

Ball bearings4

Technical Specifications

BrandCORMORAN
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €32.10
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/270

Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag

Spinning

45.80 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability2.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.23 out of 10

Gear ratio5.3:1

Maximum drag-

Weight230g / 8.11oz

Line retireve per crank68cm / 26.77 inch

Ball bearings1

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €17.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size1500
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofil0.20mm/140m

Conclusion

Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (95 centimeter / 37.4 inch) and ball bearings (4). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF and Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag?

Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF

A high retrieve rate of 9 out of 10 (95 centimeter / 37.4 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues