Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X

Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
Spinning
51.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/270

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
67.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.59 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank56 centimeter / 22.05 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/255
Conclusion
Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X edges out Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (8.59 out of 10) and the maximum drag (4kg / 8,82lbs). Still, Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 4 and a line retrieve per crank of 95 centimeter / 37.4 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF and Penn 2020 Clash II?
Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
- A high retrieve rate of 9 out of 10 (95 centimeter / 37.4 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- With a score like 8.67 out of 10 (200g / 7,05oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Delphin SHARX 3000X


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Delphin ELIXIR 5000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Delphin SHARX 3000X


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Delphin ELIXIR 5000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Delphin ELIXIR 5000X


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX
