Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X

Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
Spinning
51.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/270

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
75.80 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.61 out of 10
Ergonomics6.22 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag4.5kg / 9,92lbs
Weight235g / 8.29oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €185.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/220
Conclusion
Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X clearly outshines Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (4,5kg / 9,92lbs) and durability (8.61 out of 10). While Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF and Penn 2020 Clash II?
Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (4,5kg / 9,92lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- With a score like 8.43 out of 10 (235g / 8,29oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Sienna 4000X


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Shimano Sienna 4000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa BG 3000X vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX
