Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG

Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
Spinning
51.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/270

Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank89 centimeter / 35.04 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €409.40
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/85
Conclusion
Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG clearly outshines Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF and Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG?
Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.57 out of 10 (215g / 7,58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX


Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX
