Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX

Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
Spinning
51.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/270

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
77.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.55 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €365.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000SFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX clearly outshines Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (3kg / 6,61lbs) and weight (175g / 6,17oz). While Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF and Shimano Twin Power FE?
Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
- A high retrieve rate of 9 out of 10 (95 centimeter / 37.4 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X


Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Delphin ELIXIR 4000X


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX
