Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX

Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
Spinning
51.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/270

Shimano Twin Power XD A
Spinning
73.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €369.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/260
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX clearly outshines Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF and Shimano Twin Power XD A?
Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.6 out of 10 (5.5:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.37 out of 10 (245g / 8,64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Delphin SHARX 4000X


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa BG 4000X
