Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX

Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF
Spinning
55.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank61 centimeter / 24.02 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €24.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/140

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €661.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizePC 2500D-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX clearly outshines Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF
- With an outstanding bearing score of 9.33 out of 10 (7), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Shimano Aero BB C3000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX


Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X
