Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX

Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF
Spinning
55.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank61 centimeter / 24.02 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €24.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/140

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
85.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000FE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX clearly outshines Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and total score (8.59 out of 10). While Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF and Shimano Twin Power FE?
Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF
- With an outstanding bearing score of 9.33 out of 10 (7), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Shimano Sienna 1000X


Shimano Sienna 1000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Shimano Sienna 1000X


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Sienna 1000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X
