Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX

Cormoran Sportline 2PiF
Spinning
45.30 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank70 centimeter / 27.56 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/180

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
81.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.6 out of 10
Ergonomics6.45 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight165g / 5.82oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €181.70
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil-
Conclusion
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX clearly outshines Cormoran Sportline 2PiF, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Cormoran Sportline 2PiF may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Cormoran Sportline 2PiF and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT?
Cormoran Sportline 2PiF
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5 out of 10 (70 centimeter / 27.56 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX
