Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Cormoran Sportline 2PiF
Spinning
45.30 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank70 centimeter / 27.56 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/180

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.04 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €187.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2508
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X clearly outshines Cormoran Sportline 2PiF, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and ball bearings (8). While Cormoran Sportline 2PiF may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Cormoran Sportline 2PiF and Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
