Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX

Cormoran Sportline 2PiF
Spinning
45.30 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank70 centimeter / 27.56 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/180

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
78.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €151.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX clearly outshines Cormoran Sportline 2PiF, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Cormoran Sportline 2PiF may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Cormoran Sportline 2PiF and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Cormoran Sportline 2PiF
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5 out of 10 (70 centimeter / 27.56 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Delphin HORNET 40X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Delphin HORNET 40X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Delphin HORNET 40X


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Delphin HORNET 40X
