Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X

Cormoran Sportline 2PiF, 2500, left and right hand, spinning reel, front drag, 12-22250
Cormoran Sportline 2PiF
Spinning
45.30 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank70 centimeter / 27.56 inch
Ball bearings1

Technical Specifications

  • BrandCORMORAN
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €17.00
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size2500
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/180
Daiwa 22 Exist LT, 2500, left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10102-255
Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
88.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings12

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €668.33
  • Is saltwater resistantYes
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size2500
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Conclusion

Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X clearly outshines Cormoran Sportline 2PiF, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs). While Cormoran Sportline 2PiF may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Cormoran Sportline 2PiF and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?

Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X

  • A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
  • Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.