Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Daiwa BG 8000X

Cormoran Sportline 2PiF
Spinning
45.30 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank70 centimeter / 27.56 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/180

Daiwa BG
Spinning
68.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight850g / 29.98oz
Line retireve per crank135 centimeter / 53.15 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €129.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.45/500
Conclusion
Daiwa BG 8000X clearly outshines Cormoran Sportline 2PiF, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (6) and durability (8.5 out of 10). While Cormoran Sportline 2PiF may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa BG 8000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Cormoran Sportline 2PiF and Daiwa BG?
Cormoran Sportline 2PiF
- With a score like 8.53 out of 10 (220g / 7,76oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5 out of 10 (70 centimeter / 27.56 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Daiwa BG 8000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Delphin ELIXIR 5000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX


Delphin ELIXIR 5000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX
