Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Cormoran Sportline 2PiF
Spinning
45.30 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank70 centimeter / 27.56 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/180

Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R
Seafishing
54.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.88 out of 10
Ergonomics5.51 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight625g / 22.05oz
Line retireve per crank103 centimeter / 40.55 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €125.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/300
Conclusion
Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R clearly outshines Cormoran Sportline 2PiF, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (15kg / 33,07lbs) and ball bearings (3). While Cormoran Sportline 2PiF may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Cormoran Sportline 2PiF and Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R?
Cormoran Sportline 2PiF
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5 out of 10 (70 centimeter / 27.56 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R
- Scoring 8 out of 10 (15kg / 33,07lbs), the reel delivers reliable, smooth resistance when targeting strong fighters like snapper or pollock
- With a premium bearing count of 3 scoring 5 out of 10, our reel offers a high-end smoothness and durability, ready for all different environments
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 4000 XGX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW 10000-HX


Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-HX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Spheros SW A 18000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 5000 XGX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Shimano Spheros SW A 18000 HGX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 5000XGX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 10000-HX vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Shimano Spheros SW A 18000 HGX


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Shimano Spheros SW A 8000 HGX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX


Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 PGX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 10000-HX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 6000HGX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 PGX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 5000XGX


Shimano Spheros SW A 18000 HGX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X
