Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag

Cormoran Sportline 2PiF

Spinning

45.30 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability2.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.27 out of 10

Gear ratio5.1:1

Maximum drag-

Weight220g / 7.76oz

Line retireve per crank70 centimeter / 27.56 inch

Ball bearings1

Technical Specifications

BrandCORMORAN
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €17.00
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2500
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/180

Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag

Spinning

49.40 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability2.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.13 out of 10

Gear ratio5.3:1

Maximum drag-

Weight260g / 9.17oz

Line retireve per crank80cm / 31.50 inch

Ball bearings1

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €17.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2500
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofil0.25mm/190m

Conclusion

Both Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Cormoran Sportline 2PiF score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score. If you must choose between them, Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag offers a slight edge in line retrieve per crank, while Cormoran Sportline 2PiF may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.