Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX

Cormoran Sportline 2PiF
Spinning
45.30 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank70 centimeter / 27.56 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/180

Penn Battle III
Spinning
69.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight785g / 27.7oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €127.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/335
Conclusion
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX clearly outshines Cormoran Sportline 2PiF, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (13,6kg / 29,98lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Cormoran Sportline 2PiF may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Battle III 8000 HSX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Cormoran Sportline 2PiF and Penn Battle III?
Cormoran Sportline 2PiF
- With a score like 8.53 out of 10 (220g / 7,76oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5 out of 10 (70 centimeter / 27.56 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
- For 8 out of 10 (13,6kg / 29,98lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX
