Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC

Cormoran Sportline 2PiF

Spinning

45.30 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability2.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.27 out of 10

Gear ratio5.1:1

Maximum drag-

Weight220g / 7.76oz

Line retireve per crank70 centimeter / 27.56 inch

Ball bearings1

Technical Specifications

BrandCORMORAN
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €17.00
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2500
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/180

Shimano Catana 4000 RC

Spinning

46.10 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability2.72 out of 10

Ergonomics2 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag7kg / 15.43 lbs

Weight370g / 13.05oz

Line retireve per crank82cm / 32.28 inch

Ball bearings2 Shielded Stainless Steel + 1 Roller Bearing

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €33.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeRead drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/260. 0.30/180, 0.35/130

Conclusion

Both Shimano Catana 4000 RC and Cormoran Sportline 2PiF score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score and durability. If you must choose between them, Shimano Catana 4000 RC offers a slight edge in maximum drag, while Cormoran Sportline 2PiF may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.

What's the difference between Cormoran Sportline 2PiF and Shimano Catana 4000 RC?

Shimano Catana 4000 RC

For 8.4 out of 10 (7kg / 15.43 lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
A bearing score of 5 out of 10 (2 Shielded Stainless Steel + 1 Roller Bearing) gets the job done (basic but dependable) especially for beginners or casual anglers