Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag

Cormoran Sportline 2PiF
Spinning
45.30 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank70 centimeter / 27.56 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/180

Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag
Spinning
58.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics4.03 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag2.5 kg - 5.5 lbs
Weight290 g - 10.3oz
Line retireve per crank82 cm / 32.3 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18-290 / 0,20-240 / 0,25-160 / 0,30-105 lb/yds: 6-200 / 8-140 / 10-120
Conclusion
Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag clearly outshines Cormoran Sportline 2PiF, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (2,5 kg - 5.5 lbs) and ball bearings (3+1). While Cormoran Sportline 2PiF may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Cormoran Sportline 2PiF and Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag?
Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (2,5 kg - 5.5 lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX vs Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX
