Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF
Feeder And Match
51.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.68 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag-
Weight375g / 13.23oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €30.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/230

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
83.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 SH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX clearly outshines Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and weight (160g / 5,64oz). While Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF and Abu GARCIA Zenon?
Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX
- With a score like 8.93 out of 10 (160g / 5,64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Delphin ELIXIR 4000X


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Delphin ELIXIR 4000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Delphin ELIXIR 4000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX
