Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF
Feeder And Match
51.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.68 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag-
Weight375g / 13.23oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €30.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/230

Penn FIERCE IV
Spinning
67.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag4.5kg / 9,92lbs
Weight270g / 9.52oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €62.40
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/220
Conclusion
Penn FIERCE IV 2000X edges out Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (4,5kg / 9,92lbs) and the durability (7 out of 10). Still, Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 95 centimeter / 37.4 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF and Penn FIERCE IV?
Penn FIERCE IV 2000X
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (4,5kg / 9,92lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- With a score like 8.2 out of 10 (270g / 9,52oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Delphin REDIX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Delphin REDIX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Delphin REDIX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
