Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
84.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.6 out of 10
Ergonomics6.45 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight165g / 5.82oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €180.40
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil-
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT
Feeder And Match
4000-c (match And Feeder)x
62.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.95 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €47.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C (Match and Feeder)
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX clearly outshines Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X, offering significantly better performance in durability (8.6 out of 10) and total score (8.42 out of 10). While Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT and Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT?
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X
- This reel provides steady retrieval 82 centimeter / 32.28 inch (6.71 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons
Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X
Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X
Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R
Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X
Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25
Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X
Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX
Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX
Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X
Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X
Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX
Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X
Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX