Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT

Spinning

84.20 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability8.6 out of 10

Ergonomics6.45 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs

Weight165g / 5.82oz

Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €180.40
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size1000D-XH
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofil-

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT

Spinning

80.00 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability4.66 out of 10

Ergonomics6.42 out of 10

Gear ratio5.8:1

Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs

Weight175g / 6.17oz

Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €199.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2000 S-H
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Conclusion

Both Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX offers a durability of 8.6 out of 10, while Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 76 centimeter / 29.92 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT?

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX

Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX

When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles