Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
84.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.6 out of 10
Ergonomics6.45 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight165g / 5.82oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €180.40
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil-

Shimano Twin Power XD A
Spinning
73.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €369.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/260
Conclusion
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX edges out Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the gear ratio (6.2:1). Still, Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 11kg / 24,25lbs and a line retrieve per crank of 72 centimeter / 28.35 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT and Shimano Twin Power XD A?
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.29 out of 10 (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX
