Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
81.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.6 out of 10
Ergonomics6.45 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight165g / 5.82oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €181.70
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil-

Cormoran Sportline 2PiF
Spinning
45.30 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank70 centimeter / 27.56 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/180
Conclusion
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX clearly outshines Cormoran Sportline 2PiF, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Cormoran Sportline 2PiF may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT and Cormoran Sportline 2PiF?
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Cormoran Sportline 2PiF
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5 out of 10 (70 centimeter / 27.56 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Shimano Sienna 4000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX
