Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
81.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.6 out of 10
Ergonomics6.45 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight165g / 5.82oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €181.70
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil-

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.30 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX offers a ball bearings of 6, while Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX stands out for a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons

Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa BG 2500X


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Daiwa BG 2500X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
