Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
81.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.6 out of 10
Ergonomics6.45 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight165g / 5.82oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €181.70
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil-

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.40 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX offers a ball bearings of 6, while Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX stands out for a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X
