Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
81.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.6 out of 10
Ergonomics6.45 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight165g / 5.82oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €181.70
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil-

Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
Spinning
29.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.99 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €49.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160
Conclusion
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R, offering significantly better performance in durability (8.6 out of 10) and total score (8.1 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT and Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R?
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- With a score like 8.9 out of 10 (165g / 5,82oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76cm / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX vs Delphin SHARX 4000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X
