Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.61 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.6 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €184.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil-

Penn Slammer IV
Spinning
8500 Hsx
70.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag22.6kg / 49,82lbs
Weight870g / 30.69oz
Line retireve per crank127 centimeter / 50 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €294.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8500 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/415
Conclusion
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX clearly outshines Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (6) and line retrieve per crank (93 centimeter / 36.6 inch). While Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT and Penn Slammer IV?
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX
- With a score like 8.77 out of 10 (185g / 6,53oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.8 out of 10 (93 centimeter / 36.6 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X
