Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.61 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.6 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €184.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil-

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4
Conclusion
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Delphin INKS 6000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Delphin INKS 6000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Delphin INKS 6000X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR
