Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.61 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.6 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €184.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil-

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX
