Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
78.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.3 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €196.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
78.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €151.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX offers a line retrieve per crank of 82 centimeter / 32.3 inch, while Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX stands out for a maximum drag of 5kg / 11,02lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.3 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa BG 2500X


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag
