Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
78.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.3 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €196.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
79.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX offers a line retrieve per crank of 82 centimeter / 32.3 inch, while Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX stands out for a maximum drag of 5kg / 11,02lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.3 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Delphin INKS 3000X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Delphin HORNET 50X


Shimano Sienna 2500X vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Shimano Sienna 2500X
