Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
78.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.3 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €196.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5.29oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €635.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX and Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX offers a ball bearings of 6, while Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX stands out for a maximum drag of 5kg / 11,02lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.3 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX
