Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
78.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.3 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €196.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5.29oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €635.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX and Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX offers a ball bearings of 6, while Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX stands out for a maximum drag of 5kg / 11,02lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.3 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX
