Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
78.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.3 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €196.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5.29oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €635.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX and Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX offers a ball bearings of 6, while Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX stands out for a maximum drag of 5kg / 11,02lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.3 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Penn Battle III 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Delphin HORNET 50X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Delphin ELIXIR 5000X


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Delphin HORNET 50X


Delphin ELIXIR 5000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX
