Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
78.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.3 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €196.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €642.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizePC 2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX edges out Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and the durability (9.5 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a line retrieve per crank of 82 centimeter / 32.3 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Delphin FRIZ


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Delphin FRIZ vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X
