Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
78.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.3 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €196.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Daiwa BG MQ
Seafishing
56.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.79 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight430g / 15.17oz
Line retireve per crank101 centimeter / 39.76 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €169.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000D-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.43/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX clearly outshines Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.2:1) and line retrieve per crank (82 centimeter / 32.3 inch). While Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT and Daiwa BG MQ?
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.3 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX
- At 5.82 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the drag is on the lighter side—suitable for smaller saltwater species or finesse-style presentations
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 20000-HX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW 8000-PX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 25000X vs Shimano TLD 20X


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 5000-HX


Daiwa BG MQ 8000-HX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW (G) 5000-XHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 8000-HX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 8000-PX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 10000-HX vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 20000-HX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 20000-HX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Daiwa BG MQ 8000-HX


Daiwa BG MQ 3000D-XHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW 8000-PX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 5000-HX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Shimano TLD 20X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX
