Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
78.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.3 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €196.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Penn Battle III
Spinning
69.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight785g / 27.7oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €127.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/335
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX and Penn Battle III 8000 HSX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX offers a line retrieve per crank of 82 centimeter / 32.3 inch, while Penn Battle III 8000 HSX stands out for a maximum drag of 13,6kg / 29,98lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT and Penn Battle III?
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.3 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
- For 8 out of 10 (13,6kg / 29,98lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX
