Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
78.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.3 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €196.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Shimano Sedona FJ 500
Spinning
500x
60.50 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/110
Conclusion
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX edges out Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (82 centimeter / 32.3 inch) and the total score (7.89 out of 10). Still, Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 3kg / 6,61lbs and a durability of 7 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT and Shimano Sedona FJ 500?
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.3 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons
Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX
Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX
Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX
Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x
Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX
Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX
Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX
Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX
Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX
Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X
Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX
Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX
Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX
Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX