Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT

Spinning

78.90 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability4.65 out of 10

Ergonomics6.23 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag0lbs

Weight230g / 8.11oz

Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.3 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €196.90
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000-C
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Shimano Twin Power FE

Spinning

94.40 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability5.57 out of 10

Ergonomics6.13 out of 10

Gear ratio5.7:1

Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs

Weight260g / 9.17oz

Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch

Ball bearings9+1

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €399.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000MHGFE
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/120

Conclusion

Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX edges out Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and the line retrieve per crank (93 centimeter / 36.61 inch). Still, Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a weight of 230g / 8,11oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.

What's the difference between Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT and Shimano Twin Power FE?

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX

Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency

Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX

With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt