Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
78.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.3 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €196.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Shimano Twin Power XD A
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €369.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/260
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX edges out Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and the durability (9.5 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a weight of 230g / 8,11oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT and Shimano Twin Power XD A?
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X
