Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT

Spinning

95.00 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability8.65 out of 10

Ergonomics6.25 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs

Weight225g / 7.94oz

Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 39.0 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €196.90
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000D-CXH
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofil-

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT

Spinning

80.00 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability4.66 out of 10

Ergonomics6.42 out of 10

Gear ratio5.8:1

Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs

Weight175g / 6.17oz

Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €199.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2000 S-H
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Conclusion

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX edges out Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (8.65 out of 10) and the maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs). Still, Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX holds its own with strengths like a weight of 175g / 6,17oz and a ergonomics of 6.42 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.