Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.25 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight225g / 7.94oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 39.0 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €196.90
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil-
Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
77.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.55 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €365.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000SFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105
Conclusion
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX edges out Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the line retrieve per crank (99 centimeter / 39.0 inch). Still, Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX holds its own with strengths like a weight of 175g / 6,17oz and a ergonomics of 6.42 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT and Shimano Twin Power FE?
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX
- A high retrieve rate of 9.4 out of 10 (99 centimeter / 39.0 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons
Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX
Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX
Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX
Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX
Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX
Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX
Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI
Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX
Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX
Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX
Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X
Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI
Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX
Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX
Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX
Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX
Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX
Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX