Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX

Daiwa 17 Prorex LT
Spinning
4000 D-cx
84.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €176.20
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
74.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.52 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight143g / 5.04oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/170
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX and Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX offers a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs, while Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 17 Prorex LT and Abu GARCIA Zenon?
Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Delphin YUPIE vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Delphin YUPIE


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX
