Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 17 Prorex LT , 4000 D-C, 4000 D-C, left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10604-406
Daiwa 17 Prorex LT
Spinning
4000 D-cx
84.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €176.20
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size4000 D-C
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT, 5000S-CP, left and right hand, Feeder fishing reel, Front Drag, 10317-500
Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT
Feeder And Match
94.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings5

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelFeeder and match
  • Price range~ €177.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size5000S-CP
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Conclusion

Both Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX and Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX offers a gear ratio of 5.2:1, while Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX stands out for a total score of 9.4 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Daiwa 17 Prorex LT and Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT?

There are not much differences between the two comparables