Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X

Daiwa 17 Prorex LT
Spinning
4000 D-cx
84.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €176.20
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Delphin BRONZ
Spinning
34.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight346g / 12.2oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/350
Conclusion
Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX clearly outshines Delphin BRONZ 6000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and line retrieve per crank (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch). While Delphin BRONZ 6000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 17 Prorex LT and Delphin BRONZ?
Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.6 out of 10 (210g / 7,41oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX
