Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Delphin SHARX 4000X

Daiwa 17 Prorex LT
Spinning
4000 D-cx
84.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €176.20
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Delphin SHARX
Spinning
54.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight273g / 9.63oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €69.95
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/340
Conclusion
Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX clearly outshines Delphin SHARX 4000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Delphin SHARX 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 17 Prorex LT and Delphin SHARX?
Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Delphin SHARX 4000X
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Shimano Stella FK 2500X


Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX
