Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag

Daiwa 17 Prorex LT
Spinning
4000 D-cx
84.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €176.20
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
45.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank68cm / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.20mm/140m
Conclusion
Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 17 Prorex LT and Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa BG 2000X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa BG 2000X


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI
