Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 17 Prorex LT
Spinning
4000 D-cx
84.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €176.20
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX offers a ball bearings of 6, while Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 88 centimeter / 34.65 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 17 Prorex LT and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A?
Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.6 out of 10 (210g / 7,41oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX


Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X
