Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX

Daiwa 17 Prorex LT
Spinning
4000 D-cx
84.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €176.20
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Shimano Twin Power XD A
Spinning
73.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €369.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/260
Conclusion
Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX edges out Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the gear ratio (5.2:1). Still, Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX holds its own with strengths like a durability of 9.5 out of 10 and a maximum drag of 11kg / 24,25lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 17 Prorex LT and Shimano Twin Power XD A?
Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa BG 1500X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX vs Delphin HORNET 40X


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Delphin HORNET 40X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X vs Delphin HORNET 40X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Daiwa BG 1500X vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa BG 1500X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX
