Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX

Daiwa 17 Prorex LT
Spinning
4000 D-cx
84.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €176.20
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Shimano Vanquish FC
Spinning
84.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.52 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight145g / 5.11oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000SC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX and Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX offers a ball bearings of 6, while Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 17 Prorex LT and Shimano Vanquish FC?
Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Delphin HORNET 20X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Delphin HORNET 20X
