Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT
Feeder And Match
6000-ss (feeder)x
56.10 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight390g / 13.76oz
Line retireve per crank92 centimeter / 36.22 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €59.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000-SS (Feeder)
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Shimano 19 Stella
Spinning
88.10 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight625g / 22.05oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings14
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €809.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.41/275
Conclusion
Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX clearly outshines Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and total score (8.81 out of 10). While Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT and Shimano 19 Stella?
Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
